Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 hours ago, jh92 said:

I have that app as well, I'm sure it doesn't take pictures the same as using the built in camera app, like the quality is set on max but it doesn't seem as good as the standard camera photos 🤔

I've not really tried it yet with a fish so not sure but it would make a handy back up, I will give it a try alongside my camera, my kids took most of my recent ones on the phone as I forgot my camera last time. 

Posted
1 hour ago, kevtaylor said:

£500 any good?

Short answer..... no 😂

I can make a few recommendations but you'll need more than 500 if you're buying new mate. First thing to decide is whether you want a compact, a DSLR, or a mirrorless.

You can get compacts with big sensors and these are capable of brilliant shots. My recommendation would be the CANON PowerShot G7X Mark II. It's not DSLR quality, but most would struggle to tell the difference. They cost just over 600 quid.

Next would be DSLR. They're cheaper than mirrorless but there's a reason for that. None of the OEM's are developing DSLR lenses any more. There's still loads available, but what you see on the market now is what you get - no more development (the technology is slowly being replaced with mirrorless). It's no secret that the quality of DSLR shots is great. My recommendation would be the Canon EOS 250D which is the cheapest Canon with a flip screen. It's about £750 with a standard kit lens. You can add an EF 50mm f1.8 lens for about 120 quid which will get you AMAZING shots.

Then mirrorless. A mirrorless camera is basically a DSLR without a mirror which offers advantages. This is basically the future of photography, but they're still quite expensive. The most cost effective flip screen Canon mirrorless is the EOS R50 which comes in at about 900 with a standard kit lens. Lenses tend to be pricey but for 200 notes you could get the RF 50mm f1.8 which again will give you awesome, awesome shots.

Both the DSLR and the mirrorless above have quite big APS-C sized sensors. The next step up would be to go to a full frame sensor.... but we're then talking mega bucks.

OR... you could go second hand which opens up loads of options!

Posted
2 minutes ago, jh92 said:

DSC_0384.thumb.JPG.d8057493e8f2087f02598bc9055cfce0.JPG

The camera is still focussing on your face for some reason. See if you have 'face recognition' on. Not sure if your camera has this feature. If it does, turn it off mate.

Well done on the kipper, sounds like a great session.

Posted
15 minutes ago, yonny said:

The camera is still focussing on your face for some reason. See if you have 'face recognition' on. Not sure if your camera has this feature. If it does, turn it off mate.

Well done on the kipper, sounds like a great session.

Just been having a look mate, there's no facial recognition but the focus mode is on af-a, I'm gonna try it on 'af-s' and see if it helps, apparently when using af-a, it can focus on the face more than anything. Trial abd error I suppose 🤣

Posted
21 hours ago, yonny said:

Short answer..... no 😂

I can make a few recommendations but you'll need more than 500 if you're buying new mate. First thing to decide is whether you want a compact, a DSLR, or a mirrorless.

You can get compacts with big sensors and these are capable of brilliant shots. My recommendation would be the CANON PowerShot G7X Mark II. It's not DSLR quality, but most would struggle to tell the difference. They cost just over 600 quid.

Next would be DSLR. They're cheaper than mirrorless but there's a reason for that. None of the OEM's are developing DSLR lenses any more. There's still loads available, but what you see on the market now is what you get - no more development (the technology is slowly being replaced with mirrorless). It's no secret that the quality of DSLR shots is great. My recommendation would be the Canon EOS 250D which is the cheapest Canon with a flip screen. It's about £750 with a standard kit lens. You can add an EF 50mm f1.8 lens for about 120 quid which will get you AMAZING shots.

Then mirrorless. A mirrorless camera is basically a DSLR without a mirror which offers advantages. This is basically the future of photography, but they're still quite expensive. The most cost effective flip screen Canon mirrorless is the EOS R50 which comes in at about 900 with a standard kit lens. Lenses tend to be pricey but for 200 notes you could get the RF 50mm f1.8 which again will give you awesome, awesome shots.

Both the DSLR and the mirrorless above have quite big APS-C sized sensors. The next step up would be to go to a full frame sensor.... but we're then talking mega bucks.

OR... you could go second hand which opens up loads of options!

Thanks for the info mate

I would consider second hand reconditioned for sure, had looked at a few online.

I thought mine would last my lifetime but it won't even take a picture or respond to any button pressing.

Posted
On 11/09/2024 at 15:54, yonny said:

Short answer..... no 😂

I can make a few recommendations but you'll need more than 500 if you're buying new mate. First thing to decide is whether you want a compact, a DSLR, or a mirrorless.

You can get compacts with big sensors and these are capable of brilliant shots. My recommendation would be the CANON PowerShot G7X Mark II. It's not DSLR quality, but most would struggle to tell the difference. They cost just over 600 quid.

Next would be DSLR. They're cheaper than mirrorless but there's a reason for that. None of the OEM's are developing DSLR lenses any more. There's still loads available, but what you see on the market now is what you get - no more development (the technology is slowly being replaced with mirrorless). It's no secret that the quality of DSLR shots is great. My recommendation would be the Canon EOS 250D which is the cheapest Canon with a flip screen. It's about £750 with a standard kit lens. You can add an EF 50mm f1.8 lens for about 120 quid which will get you AMAZING shots.

Then mirrorless. A mirrorless camera is basically a DSLR without a mirror which offers advantages. This is basically the future of photography, but they're still quite expensive. The most cost effective flip screen Canon mirrorless is the EOS R50 which comes in at about 900 with a standard kit lens. Lenses tend to be pricey but for 200 notes you could get the RF 50mm f1.8 which again will give you awesome, awesome shots.

Both the DSLR and the mirrorless above have quite big APS-C sized sensors. The next step up would be to go to a full frame sensor.... but we're then talking mega bucks.

OR... you could go second hand which opens up loads of options!

What do you think of this mate, is it everything I need lens wise?  Scenics and portraits?

https://www.currys.co.uk/products/canon-eos-250d-dslr-camera-with-efs-1855-mm-f3.55.6-iii-and-ef-50-mm-f1.8-stm-lens-10192408.html

 

Posted
On 11/09/2024 at 13:27, jh92 said:

I have that app as well, I'm sure it doesn't take pictures the same as using the built in camera app, like the quality is set on max but it doesn't seem as good as the standard camera photos 🤔

I'm sure that none of them are quite as good, and I am positive that you don't need them as the phone camera already has a voice app.

I was goggling around when I found this, it's not explained in my Samsung 'destructions', but after a couple of colour differences between Selfie voice app and self timer with flash I started to look further.

Screenshot_20240909_230227_Chrome.jpg

Posted
1 hour ago, salokcinnodrog said:

I'm sure that none of them are quite as good, and I am positive that you don't need them as the phone camera already has a voice app.

I was goggling around when I found this, it's not explained in my Samsung 'destructions', but after a couple of colour differences between Selfie voice app and self timer with flash I started to look further.

Screenshot_20240909_230227_Chrome.jpg

This is what I use now, especially handy when handling spiny,  toothy critters from the sea. Though you do get some odd looks when you shout "shoot" and your on your own holding a fish🤣

Posted

Night shots

Can anyone please help with camera settings for this nightmare area?

I've got 2 lights that I put on banks sticks with each pointing across the fish (is this right)?  and I'm told this is better than using flash.

If you shoot with auto settings you get a blurred shot through movement, so I assume you up the shutter speed consideraby?

I've got a night portrait setting but cant see that working in this situation.

Thanks in advance 👍

 

Posted
20 hours ago, kevtaylor said:

Night shots

Can anyone please help with camera settings for this nightmare area?

I've got 2 lights that I put on banks sticks with each pointing across the fish (is this right)?  and I'm told this is better than using flash.

If you shoot with auto settings you get a blurred shot through movement, so I assume you up the shutter speed consideraby?

I've got a night portrait setting but cant see that working in this situation.

Thanks in advance 👍

 

The bank stick lights just give you enough for the camera to set its focus point. For the shot itself, a flash is essential imo. If you have a half decent flash, I would recommend using the same settings as day time tbh.

Posted
2 hours ago, yonny said:

The bank stick lights just give you enough for the camera to set its focus point. For the shot itself, a flash is essential imo. If you have a half decent flash, I would recommend using the same settings as day time tbh.

You're talking about buying a flash to stick on top? Or is the inbuilt enough?

Cheers dude 👍

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...