The Green Party

[commonly]

Oh dear!

Do you read the mail?

You mean it's sold there, not produced. 

So, it's not a mafia/gang making all the profits???🤔

[Dave Fowler]

2 hours ago, commonly said:

Oh dear!

Do you read the mail?

You mean it's sold there, not produced. 

So, it's not a mafia/gang making all the profits???🤔

It wasn't literal but you missed that.

Afghanistan? 

[commonly]

The barbers, vape & phone repair shops, etc., are just a front, where the dodgy cash gets laundered.

The war on drugs is a lost cause & successive governments are too stubborn to admit it. Instead of regulating and taxing it.

I think its Portugal that tried this years ago. Guess what overall drug misuse dropped significantly. 

That's a win in my book

15 minutes ago, Dave Fowler said:

Afghanistan

What's this got to do with the Greens?

[greekskii]

Green is carpy. End of. 

[elmoputney]

54 minutes ago, greekskii said:

Green is carpy. End of. 

Proper carpy. 

 

[commonly]

I might be wrong, but wasn't there talk of them banning leisure fishing??

Urm!

[greekskii]

Reform and restore are waging war on animal cruelty too. 

[elmoputney]

1 hour ago, greekskii said:

Reform and restore are waging war on animal cruelty too. 

Don't forget the human suffering they are planning. 

[elmoputney]

2 hours ago, commonly said:

I might be wrong, but wasn't there talk of them banning leisure fishing??

Urm!

They can't just ban anything without putting it through parliament and lords tbh, I couldn't see it getting through there would be a huge pushback , but at least we would have cleaner rivers and lakes to fish. 

 

[Dave Fowler]

You can't fish a lake or river regardless of its purity if the sport is banned.

The Groans will deliver nothing but austerity and mediaevalism, they are categorically not the party they used to be.

I don't want to wait and see,  by then it'll be too late.

One day it'll be Christmas, gobble gobble.

[greekskii]

As long as they can do maths properly and understand it, they’ll do better than 99% of other politicians 

[elmoputney]

3 hours ago, Dave Fowler said:

You can't fish a lake or river regardless of its purity if the sport is banned.

The Groans will deliver nothing but austerity and mediaevalism, they are categorically not the party they used to be.

I don't want to wait and see,  by then it'll be too late.

One day it'll be Christmas, gobble gobble.

Who said they will ban it not them when I asked? 

Also what do you think we've had in this country for the last 40 years, Thatcher started the rot and we've been asset stripped ever since. Thinking Rupert Lowe will solve anything 😂😂😂😂😂😂

Priceless 

[salokcinnodrog]

On 28/02/2026 at 10:17, Dave Fowler said:

Stop talking sense now. 😆 

Legalised hard drugs, really ?

It's in their manifesto and Zack Polanski said on the news:

"Speaking to BBC South East ahead of his party conference, Zack Polanski said he agreed with a Kent Green councillor, who earlier this year called for the legalisation of all drugs, including class A drugs like heroin and crack cocaine."

So you legalise drugs, and in the process increase the welfare bill and psychiatric reliance in the NHS.

 

If you go the other way and reduce the 'acceptability' of drug taking, increase criminal punishment and dare I say it prevent the incoming mafia dealers from abroad by reducing immigration you can start to break the problem.

 

 

[emmcee]

23 hours ago, elmoputney said:

Don't forget the human suffering they are planning. 

Excuse my ignorance but what human suffering are restore or reform  planning? 

[elmoputney]

33 minutes ago, emmcee said:

Excuse my ignorance but what human suffering are restore or reform  planning? 

Remigration of illegal immigrants, that will become a witch hunt of any non white citizen of the UK. 

This is part of their policy manifesto 

Operationally, the paper recommends a two-pronged approach: voluntary departures reaching around half a million or more per year driven by a hostile environment, and between 150,000 - 200,000 enforced removals per year.

Just sounds like BNP fascist nonsense to me. Exactly the same sort of propaganda present in 1930's Germany. 

[framey]

1 minute ago, elmoputney said:

Remigration of illegal immigrants, that will become a witch hunt of any non white citizen of the UK. 

This is part of their policy manifesto 

Operationally, the paper recommends a two-pronged approach: voluntary departures reaching around half a million or more per year driven by a hostile environment, and between 150,000 - 200,000 enforced removals per year.

Just sounds like BNP fascist nonsense to me. Exactly the same sort of propaganda present in 1930's Germany. 

Illegal immigrants…

yup, no problem with that.

if you want to come over then do it the correct way.

[elmoputney]

1 minute ago, framey said:

Illegal immigrants…

yup, no problem with that.

if you want to come over then do it the correct way.

How can they when there is no safe and legal routes sent up? 

[framey]

19 minutes ago, elmoputney said:

How can they when there is no safe and legal routes sent up? 

That’s down to the government to sort out not me.

Britain has been built on migration so I genuinely have no problem with it 

we would be screwed without it.

illegal, then that’s a different story.

[elmoputney]

3 hours ago, salokcinnodrog said:

It's in their manifesto and Zack Polanski said on the news:

"Speaking to BBC South East ahead of his party conference, Zack Polanski said he agreed with a Kent Green councillor, who earlier this year called for the legalisation of all drugs, including class A drugs like heroin and crack cocaine."

So you legalise drugs, and in the process increase the welfare bill and psychiatric reliance in the NHS.

 

If you go the other way and reduce the 'acceptability' of drug taking, increase criminal punishment and dare I say it prevent the incoming mafia dealers from abroad by reducing immigration you can start to break the problem.

 

 

People start taking drugs for a lot of reasons. Most aren't criminals quite often victims of circumstance. The prisons are already overcrowded and just breed more addicts, who then get released and the cycle continues. Rehabilitation into society would be a more useful tool. And by controlling drugs it could be taxed to fund treatment and rehabilitation so people could get back on their feet and contribute and integrate into society. Punishing people for taking drugs doesn't work but it makes criminals richer. 

[elmoputney]

1 minute ago, framey said:

That’s down to the government to sort out not me.

Britain has been built on migration so I genuinely have no problem with it 

we would be screwed without it.

illegal, then that’s a different story.

It's not illegal to claim asylum. 

[framey]

11 minutes ago, elmoputney said:

It's not illegal to claim asylum. 

In the first safe country.

dont need to go through 10 other safe countries to claim asylum 

plus asylum and migration are 2 different things.

Edited 1 hour ago by framey

[framey]

Ps 

I have no real problem with real  asylum either.

Edited 1 hour ago by framey

[elmoputney]

11 minutes ago, framey said:

In the first safe country.

dont need to go through 10 other safe countries to claim asylum 

plus asylum and migration are 2 different things.

Key Points on Claiming Asylum in the UK

No "First Country" Rule: There is no international law stating that refugees must claim asylum in the first safe country they reach.

UK Inadmissibility Policy: Under UK law, the Home Secretary can declare a claim inadmissible if you were previously in a safe country where you could have claimed asylum.

Removal Challenges: While the government aims to remove people to safe third countries, this requires that another country is willing to accept them, which is not always feasible.

Post-Brexit: The UK is no longer part of the EU Dublin Regulations, which previously allowed for the transfer of asylum seekers back to their first point of entry into the EU.

How to Claim: You must be present in the UK to claim asylum; it is not possible to apply from outside the country, such as at a UK embassy. 

 

[salokcinnodrog]

2 hours ago, elmoputney said:

Remigration of illegal immigrants, that will become a witch hunt of any non white citizen of the UK. 

This is part of their policy manifesto 

Operationally, the paper recommends a two-pronged approach: voluntary departures reaching around half a million or more per year driven by a hostile environment, and between 150,000 - 200,000 enforced removals per year.

Just sounds like BNP fascist nonsense to me. Exactly the same sort of propaganda present in 1930's Germany. 

So this country can continue to afford incoming immigration?

You do know that Britain has had over 10million come into this country since 2010?

The cost per day to the UK taxpayer is around £6million.

The majority are not refugees, not asylum seekers, but are economic migrants.

 

The total last year who were genuine refugees is 33,000, out of 898,000.

Some figures to make you think, and why we cannot continue to allow the system as it is.