Thatâs exactly where I am when it comes to bait, i much prefer a food source bait over a bait thatâs all food signal/smell but little substance. I could have used the same attractor profiles, flavours, oils and powdered attractors and bunged them into a 50/50 semolina/soya base, I would get bites on it short term, but I like having something nutritional that they will come back to, in the thought it is doing some good.
of course itâs all guess work really, my fish meal baits have shellfish sense appeals and monster crab as a flavour, when I smell them, they smell like, well shellfish and crab! But that isnât how the carp smell them do they? They donât smell like we do as such, they recognise them at a different level, maybe the chemical base of the flavour. So theres me thinking well itâs 2ml of shellfish SA and 0.5ml of MC, but as the flavours are from the same company, which probably use the same base for these flavours, the carp are just detecting 2.5ml of the base chemical? After all, when we smell ethyl acetate, we smell pear drops, but the carp just detects ethyl acetate? So use 2 different fruit flavours with the same ethyl acetate base and to the carp itâs all the same?
In colder waters, I want a flavour thatâs more soluble, so it can escape the bait, I also wanted a coarser base to help with leakage, hence the bird food. Yet I added fruit factor 6 as a powdered attractor, which wonât have the same solubility, but can help in ârepellingâ silt ingress to the baits - my waters are pretty silty, but again, is this important?
on one of my waters, I was told that I wonât catch unless I use pop ups to keep the bait out of the silt.
All my carp in the last 2 seasons have been on bottom baits in the siltâŚ
when I fish pop ups, they tend to be low lying pop ups over the gravelly edges in the margins, fished in complete isolation. I know that the carp are in these margins regularly, so a single pop up in the right place will produce the goods.
there is a belief that silt tainted baits will not be as acceptable to carp, but I disagree, they are used to feeding in silt, their senses through their barbules are extremely sensitive, if they detect a boilie in the silt they will still recognise the food signals itâs kicking out.
One lad couldnât believe that I had 4 runs in one night fishing bottom baits in the silt, when we talked about it, he said that when he fished bottom baits in the middle he caught nothing. But thatâs not the bait, but down to the type of silt, where the hook bait was placed.
some silt is horrible sour crud that the carp doesnât like to feed over, but some silt is much finer, with a more neutral âtasteâ (?) without that sour smell that the carp will happily feed over, itâs where bloodworm and other goodies are naturally found so the bait presentation wasnât the issue, the location of that bait was.
if I offered you a nice meal on a clean plate, youâd eat it, if I offered the same meal on a plate that was smeared with human excrement, you wouldnât go anywhere near it. Thatâs how I see it anyway.
I still like to sniff my marker leads, as well as drill and score them to collect silt so I can see what itâs like